PubMed · 12222229
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C Blayo. 1992. Two routes, same destination.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12222229/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Recent reviews reach conflicting conclusions on breast cancer risk after spontaneous or induced abortion. E3N is a large-scale cohort study collecting detailed information on environmental and reproductive factors. We investigated the relation between breast cancer and a history of induced and/or spontaneous abortion, using the data from the 100,000 women aged 40-65 at entrance in 1990. Among them, over 2,600 new invasive breast cancers had been diagnosed by June 2000. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for known potential confounders, showed no association between a history of induced abortion and breast cancer risk either in the whole population (relative risk [RR] = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.99) or in subgroups defined by parity or by menopausal status. Overall, the association between spontaneous abortion and breast cancer was not significant (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.15). However, there is a suggestion of increased risk with increased number of miscarriages (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.92-1.56 after 3 or more). Moreover, an interaction with menopausal status was observed. In premenopause, the risk decreased with increasing number of spontaneous abortions, whereas it increased in postmenopause. Among nulliparous and parous women, the relative risk estimates were respectively equal to 1.16 (95% CI 1.04-1.30, p trend < 0.0008) and 1.14 (95% CI 1.01-1.28, p trend = 0.005). Premenopausal breast cancer, on the other hand, appeared to be less frequent in women who had had repeated miscarriages. We conclude that there is no relationship between breast cancer and induced abortion but that an association with spontaneous abortion is possible and may depend on menopausal status.
INTRODUCTION: Prenatal screening for fetal abnormalities may identify conditions likely to result in perinatal death or in survival with a risk of handicap, for which termination of pregnancy is legal in many countries. DISCUSSION: When considering termination of pregnancy, it is crucial that prenatal diagnosis be as accurate as possible and that the prognosis of the condition diagnosed in utero is thoroughly understood by the parents. Our ability to predict postnatal outcome in borderline cases should not be overestimated. Parents should not precipitate their decision, and in some European countries, the absence of a gestational age limit at which a termination may be performed is viewed as a guarantee against hasty terminations. Maternal morbidity potentially associated with termination should be kept as low as possible. This includes maternal analgesia, and avoiding uterine trauma to preserve fertility and to prevent obstetrical complications in subsequent pregnancies. Bereavement should also be taken into account. Tests that could contribute to confirming the diagnosis or to establishing the aetiology of the abnormality, such as fetal karyotype or platelet count, should be implemented when appropriate, since post-termination genetic counselling relies on such data. Post-mortem examination is often crucial for genetic counselling and should include X-rays and gross examination of the fetus as well as brain and spine examination by a neuropathologist with expertise in the field of fetal medicine. Specific post-mortem procedures sometimes need to be planned before termination, for instance, in fetal akinesia sequence. First trimester surgical techniques and second or third trimester medical techniques of termination of pregnancy are reviewed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.