PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14735974

Split flow and bypass flow systems for monolithic capillary columns in liquid chromatography.

Abstract

Split flow and bypass flow systems were assembled using Nano Y Connectors with low dead volume commercially available for capillary liquid chromatography (LC). The split ratio could be controlled by changing the dimension of restriction tubing and applied back pressure to the restriction tubing. The split flow system allowed us to use valve injectors and pumps commercially available for capillary LC. The reproducibility of the present split flow system was acceptable. The relative standard deviation for six successive measurements was 0.4% for the retention time, whereas that for the peak height and peak area was 1-3% depending on the analytes. The bypass flow system uses two Nano Y Connectors, where the eluent split at the first Nano Y Connector, which is located in the inlet of the separation column, is merged again into the effluent from the column at the second Nano Y Connector. The bypass flow system could avoid on-column detection and allowed us to use flow cells, leading to an approximate three times improvement in signal-to-noise. The present flow systems were evaluated by using aromatic hydrocarbons and alkylbenzenes as test analytes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Toyohide Takeuchi, Shinichi Tatsumi, Shinichi Masuoka, Katsuaki Hirose, Hideyuki Uzu, Ji-Ye Jin, Chuzo Fujimoto, Kazutoku Ohta, Kwang-Pill Lee, Je-Jeong Ryoo, Seong-Ho Choi. 2003-12-22. Split flow and bypass flow systems for monolithic capillary columns in liquid chromatography.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2003.08.087

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Determination of phenolic metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in human urine as their pentafluorobenzyl ether derivatives using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous environmental contaminants, and a number of them are carcinogenic. One approach for measuring exposure to them is to determine the concentrations of metabolites in urine. The pyrene metabolite 1-hydroxypyrene has been used as a biomarker for exposure in numerous studies. However, determination of exposure to several PAHs may be advantageous, since the relative amounts may vary depending upon the exposure source. We developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of phenolic metabolites of naphthalene, fluorene, phenanthrene, and pyrene in human urine. Following enzymatic cleavage of the glucuronide and sulfate conjugates, the phenolic metabolites are extracted from urine and converted to pentafluorobenzyl ethers. These derivatives greatly enhance the sensitivity of detection by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization in the negative ion mode. Lower limits of quantitation range from 0.01 to 0.5 ng/mL. Stable isotope-labeled internal standards were synthesized or obtained commercially. Data on urinary excretion of several PAH metabolites in urine of smokers and nonsmokers are presented.

Chromatography, Liquid↗

MicroSPE-nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS using 10-microm-i.d. silica-based monolithic columns for proteomics.

Silica-based monolithic capillary columns (25 cm x 10 microm i.d.) with integrated nanoESI emitters have been developed to provide high-quality and robust microSPE-nanoLC-ESI-MS analyses. The integrated nanoESI emitter adds no dead volume to the LC separation, allowing stable electrospray operation at flow rates of approximately 10 nL/min. In an initial application with a linear ion trap MS, we identified 5510 unique peptides that covered 1443 distinct Shewanella oneidensis proteins from a 300-ng tryptic digest sample in a single 4-h LC-MS/MS analysis. The use of an integrated monolithic ESI emitter provided enhanced resistance to clogging and provided good run-to-run reproducibility.

Chromatography, Liquid↗

Method validation for the analysis of 169 pesticides in soya grain, without clean up, by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using positive and negative electrospray ionization.

Part of a comprehensive study on the comparison of different extraction methods, GC-MS(/MS) and LC-MS/MS detection methods and modes, for the analysis of soya samples is described in this paper. The validation of an acetone-based extraction method for analysis of 169 pesticides in soya, using LC-MS/MS positive and negative electrospray ionisation (ESI) mode, is reported. Samples (5 g) were soaked with 10 g water and subsequently extracted with 100 mL of a mixture of acetone, dichloromethane and light petroleum (1:1:1), in the presence of 15 g anhydrous sodium sulphate. After centrifugation, aliquots of the extract were evaporated and reconstituted in 1.0 mL of methanol, before direct injection of the final extract (corresponding with 0.05 g soya mL(-1)) into the LC-MS/MS system. Linearity, r(2) of calibration curves, instrument limit of detection/quantitation (LOD/LOQ) and matrix effect were evaluated, based on seven concentrations measured in 6-fold. Good linearity (at least r(2)> or =0.99) of the calibration curves was obtained over the range from 0.1 or 0.25 to 10.0 ng mL(-1), corresponding with pesticide concentrations in soya bean extract of 2 or 5-200 microg kg(-1). Instrument LOD values generally were 0.1 or 0.25 ng mL(-1). Matrix effects were negligible for approximately 90% of the pesticides. The accuracy, precision and method LOQ were determined via recovery experiments, spiking soya at 10, 50, 100 microg kg(-1), six replicates per level. In both ESI modes, method LOQ values were mostly 10 or 50 microg kg(-1) and more than 70% of pesticides analysed by each mode met the acceptability criteria of recovery (70-120%) and RSD (< or =20%), at one or more of the three levels studied. A fast, easy and efficient method with acceptable performance was achieved for a difficult matrix as soya, without cleanup.

Chromatography, Liquid↗